Open Journal of Bacteriology

Mini Review       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Antibiotic Selection and Dosage in Dermatology: A Primer

Atreyo Chakraborty*

26 C Selimpore Lane, Dhakuria, Kolkata, India

Author and article information

*Corresponding author: Atreyo Chakraborty, 26 C Selimpore Lane, Dhakuria, Kolkata, India, E-mail: [email protected]
Submitted: 30 April, 2026 | Accepted: 25 May, 2026 | Published: 26 May, 2026
Keywords: Antibiotics; Dermatology; Antimicrobial resistance; Pemphigus vulgaris; Toxic epidermal necrolysis; Carbapenem resistance; MRSA; Sepsis; Fluoroquinolones; Tetracyclines

Cite this as

Chakraborty A. Antibiotic Selection and Dosage in Dermatology: A Primer. Open J Bac. 2026; 10(1): 1-6. Available from: 10.17352/ojb.000031

Copyright License

© 2026 Chakraborty A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Antibiotics remain a cornerstone in dermatological practice, particularly in conditions associated with barrier disruption, secondary bacterial infections, and systemic sepsis. Dermatological emergencies such as pemphigus vulgaris, toxic epidermal necrolysis, erythroderma, and infected ulcers often require prompt empirical antimicrobial therapy before culture and sensitivity reports become available. This review provides a concise and clinically oriented overview of commonly used antibiotics in dermatology, emphasizing their mechanisms of action, antimicrobial spectrum, dosage regimens, adverse effects, and renal dose modifications. Major antibiotic classes discussed include penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, macrolides, glycopeptides, and other reserve antimicrobials used in multidrug-resistant infections. Emerging concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant organisms, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and pan-resistant Pseudomonas and Klebsiella species are highlighted. The review also outlines practical antibiotic selection strategies for dermatological emergencies and severe cutaneous infections. Judicious antibiotic use guided by local antibiograms, culture sensitivity reports, and infectious disease consultation is strongly recommended to combat the growing burden of antimicrobial resistance.

MRSA: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRSA: Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRE: Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci; ESBL: Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase; PEAK: Pseudomonas, Escherichia coli Acinetobacter Klebsiella; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; SCCM: Society of Critical Care Medicine; MIC: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; eGFR: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; DRESS: Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms; OPD: Outpatient Department; IV: Intravenous; IM: Intramuscular

Introduction

Antibacterial drugs are often required in those conditions where breach of the skin barrier function is accompanied by signs and symptoms of infections. While standard guidelines recommend deciding antibiotics decided by culture and sensitivity reports, they are often time consuming and are not available for the first three days (that is, 72 hours). During this time, empirical antibiotics must be considered. As any dermatologist can testify, conditions such as Pemphigus vulgaris with a large body surface area, Toxic epidermal necrolysis and certain erythroderms are extremely prone to get infected and quickly progress to sepsis. The following primer will help the dermatology internist select an appropriate antibiotic and its proper dosage.

Classification of antibiotics based on Mechanism of Action

  1. Cell Wall Inhibitors: They inhibit formation of bacterial cell wall. They are frequently bactericidal. Classic Examples include: Bacitracin, Tobramycin, Beta Lactam antibiotics (including cephalosproins), Cephalosporins, Vancomycin.
  2. Protein Synthesis Inhibitors: They bind to mRNA and rRNA and inhibit one step of protein synthesis. They are broadly divided into:
  1. Binding to 30 S Subunit: Aminoglycosides and Tetracyclines
  2. Binding to 50S Subunit: Streptograminins, Macrolides, Lincoamides and Linezolid.

The penicillins

In today’s dermatological acute skin care, their use has considerably declined due to rapid emergence of resistance. They are classical cell wall inhibitors with a central B lactam ring. The availability of orally active agents such as Amoxycillin with a Beta lactamase inhibitor confers a reasonable option particularly for management in outpatient basis when only oral drugs can be used. Their spectrum primarily includes Gram positive organisms like Staphylococcus (excluding MRSA). The use of other penicllins like Penicllin G or Benzathine Penicillin is now obsolete, except in select settings such as treatment of syphilis. The rapid advent of Beta Lactamase producing bacteria have limited their use. While initially considered a domain of Gram negative pathogens, Beta lactamase production by staphylococcus has become almost universal. Major b-lactamase families include plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases [1]. There exist considerable geographic variations in the spectrum of Beta lactamase inhibitors which KPC Serine carbapenemase being detected more in the Americas whereas metalloproteinase B lactamases found distinctively more commonly in the Indian subcontinent, which varies from 70% to 85% [2]. Pharmacokinetics data should dictate the dosage modifications in the elderly and those with chronic kidney disease [Table 1].

Most penicillins do not need dose adjustments in chronic Kidney disease for loading dose, however maintenance dose may require dose adjustment as per estimated GFR. For Amoxycillin the doses are CrCl 10-30: 500 mg q12h

CrCl <10: 500 mg q24h [3]. Similar dosage modifications for other Aminopeniiilins are available in many primers [3].

The carbepenems [1-2]

Main Spectrum: Gram Negative. Highly useful for PEAK pathogens (Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Acinetobacter, Klebsiella). However the higher prevalence of Carbepenem resistance across many tertiary care centres in India have limited their. Use. Resistosome analyses of the six major Carbapenem resistance pathogens have been performed, which showed an overall prevalcence of 24% with Acinetobacter baumanii showing upto 48% resistance, closely followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae at 12% [4]. IPM-MEM resistance discrepancies were found in Citrobacter and Proteus species. Gene profiling of resistant strains revealed the predominance of blaNDM, blaVIM in all organism. Common types of Carbapenemases include KPC (Class A), NDM, VIM, IMP (Class B), and OXA-48 (Class D). If resistance is suspected it is preferable to get guided by culture sensitivity results – however for empiric therapy, use of Collistin, Tigecycline and Fosfomycin Trometamol or switching over to Tazoactam-Vaborbactam has been helpful [5,6].

Dose Adjustment should always be done as per creatinine clearance since accumulation to toxic levels is associated with increased risk of seizures [3].

Table 2: The Cephalosporins

3rd generation cephalosporins are broad spectrum with mainly Gram Negative coverage including PEAK pathogens with significant extension into gram positive coverage. Useful in combination with other antimicrobials for PEAK pathogens. The prevalence of 3rd generation cephalosporinase producing Excherichia coli has surprisingly decreased to 10% [7] in 2015 as compared to 2010. Production of Beta Lactamases, production of efflux proteins, compensatory overproduction of cell wall peptides, sequestration of bacteria inside debris where antibiotic cannot penetrate are some of the mechanisms of widespread cephalosporin resistance [7]. As with other gram negative bacterial resistance, coverage guided by culture sensitivity values should help. Since plasmid borne resistance is rapidly spread and it may not always be prudent to wait for sensitivity values, switching over to Carbapenems and in extreme cases the vintage antibiotics such as Collistin, polymyxin, aminoglycosides should help. Some cephalosporins are associated with risk of hepatotoxicity: They include: Cephalzoline, Cefuroxime, Ceftriaxone, Cefnidir, Cefepime, Cefotetan and Cefoxitin. Documented reports of hepatic injury have ranged from asymptomatic cholestatsis to fulminant hepatic failure [8]. Of note, dose adjustment in case of renal failure is needed for all cephalosproins except Ceftriaxone which is metabolized by liver and Cefoperazone.

Table 3: The Fluoroquinolones [9]

These are helpful in infections caused by suspected gram negative bacilli such as PEAK pathogens. They are classic Gyrase inhibitors, a critical enzyme needed for uncoling the double helix structure of DNA needed for bacterial replication. Fluoroquinolone resistance is common in E coli and M tuberculosis (where it is often used as a second line drug). Prevalence has ranged from 30% to over 50% [10]. Of note, Nesisseria gonorrhoea, which can case disseminated gonococcus infection and where fluoroquinolones used to be a recommendation by the CDC guidelines, have recently shown upto 100% resistance and is no longer recommended as 1st line. Dose adjustment is needed in renal failure as per estimated GFR [3] [Table 4].

Table 4 – The Tetracyclines and Macrolides

In today’s dermatological practice, the primary use of these drugs is for their anti inflammatory effect, rather than for their antibiotic effect. Notable uses include acne (specially with pustules), bullous pemphigoid, cicatricial alopecias like folliculitis decalvans, erosive pustular dermatoses of the scalp. Tetarcyclines bind to 30S subunit of rRNA and thereby inhibit the complex formation necessary for translation. Unfortunately prevalence of resistance is increasing at a dramatic pace. Alternation of binding site at 30S subunit, development of efflux pumps and alternate splicing mechanisms account for some of the resistance patterns to tetracyclines. For Propionibacterium acnes, the prevalence of resistance to the Tetracyclines are as follows: Minocycline 0.2%- 0.5%, Tetracycline 2% – 5%, Doxycycline 2.4% – 8%. In these cases, it is preferable to switch over to a retinoid or an alternate tetracyclines [11]. Of note, both Indian Association of Dermatologists Venereologists and Leprologists guidelines and other guidelines have recommended against the monotherapy with tetracyclines in the treatment of acne vulgaris [11-13]. Even low dose doxycycline as low as 40 mg once daily have been found to be therapeutically effective for acne [13]. Of note, Doxycycline is one of the drugs used in syndromic management of Sexually Transmitted Infections. Also Doycyline is one antibiotic of the class which can be used if renal status is no known since it is not nephrotoxic. All other tetrcyclines need dose adjustment in renal failure as per eGFR [3]. Also chloramphenicol cannot be used in neonates since it may cause gray baby syndrome due to hepatic insufficiency [Table 5].

Aminoglycosides

These group of drugs are very valuable particularly when dealing with sepsis in Pemphigus or Toxic epidermal necrolysis patients with Pseudomonas or other PEAK (Pseudomonas, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumanii, Klebsiella pneumoniae). Like Tetracylicnes, they bind to 30 S subunit of ribosomes and halt the protein translation. Renal modified dosage must be used in those with sepsis induced acute kidney injury. Hospital acquired pneumonia in these patients also respond well. Spectinomycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic which has been recommended by CDC Atlanta for management of drug resistant gonorrhoea. Unfortunately it is not available in India. Dose adjustment is needed for renal failure as per eGFR [3] [Table 6].

Macrolides

These were main stay in the management of acne and related conditions but the rapid development of resistance have made their use obsolete in acne and have been superceeded by tetracycline group of antibiotics. They are also very valuable in management of sexually transmitted infections caused by bacteria without a cell wall as in Chlamydia trachomatis and Gardenerella vaginalis where they serve as alternate agents. For the dermatology internist, their use is limited in the treatment of minor skin and soft tissue infections. ROM regimen which featured Rifampicin, Ofloxacin and Minocycline has been used as an alternate regimen to leprosy, particularly in those with Rifampicin resistance. In Rifamicin Resistance, as per WHO recommendations one is supposed to choose from two of these agents: Ofloxacin, Minocycline or Clarithromycin given together with compulsory Clofazimine for a period of 6 months. For the next 18 months, one of the aforementioned (in place of two) is chosen and combined with clofazimine for the rest of the 18 months [14] [Table 7].

Selecting an appropriate antibiotic regimen: Situation specific guidelines

1.    Infected Pemphigus and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis with large body surface areas:

Since the commonest infecting organisms are Gram positive cocci which are skin commensals such as Staphylococcus aureus followed by Gram negative organisms like Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and others, a proper regimen is one antibiotic for gram positive coverage with 2 antibiotics for Gram negative coverage [3,4]. An example of this regimen is Amoxycillin-Clavulanate with Levofloxacin and imipenem or other carbepenems.

Another possible regimen is using a 3rd Generation cephalosporin such as Cefotaxime or Ceftriaxone with a Fluoroquinolone with an Aminoglycoside. While dealing with Pemphigus, due consideration should be always given to hospital acquired infections, such as MRSA, Pseduomonas, Klebsiella and Acinetobacter. Some clues to their possibility, prior to the availability of culture sensitivity reports are a history of prior admission to a hospital, prolonged hospital stay, sudden worsening of sepsis or sudden increase in pus discharge, sudden spikes of fever or hypothermia, formation of greenish colonies on denuded skin.

2.   The problem of pan resistant organisms

Our experience in a tertiary care centre suggests most isolates in infected patients are pan resistant – predominantly pan resistant Klebsiella and Pseudomonas. Both organisms are notoriously difficult to treat.

Pan resistant klebsiella

One algorithm for pan resistant Klebsiella is combining high dose Tigecycline with colistin [5]. Another such algorithm is combing two carbepenems given above with colistin [6]. Other options include combination of ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam, or cefiderocol as monotherapy, if carbapenemase testing results are not available [7].

Pan resistant pseudomonas

It is defined as P. aeruginosa exhibiting non-susceptibility to all of the following: piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin [20].

The IDSA recommends an aminoglycoside in combination with either ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, or imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, preferentially selecting the b-lactam-b-lactamase inhibitor agent for which the MIC is closest to its susceptibility breakpoint [15-20].

How long to continue antibiotics?

Because of poor penetration, most infected pemphigus patients require 10 – 14 days of therapy. For sepsis, as per Surviving Sepsis Campaign, the continuation antibiotics beyond defervescence and clinical improvement must be decided by procalcitonin levels.

Conclusion

With the advent of pan resistant organisms, the dermatologist must familiarize themselves with the proper antibiotic selection and proper dosage. Wherever possible, antibiotic selection must be guided by proper sensitivity testing and the help of a relevant infectious disease physician should be sought.

  1. Ush K, Bradford PA. Epidemiology of β-lactamase-producing pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020 Feb 26;33(2):e00047-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00047-19 
  2. Quayum A, Karmaker M, Ananna TY, Asna SMZH. Prevalence of MRSA, ESBL, and AMPC-beta-lactamase-producing bacterial profile in pus sample [Internet]. Indian J Microbiol Res. 2022 [cited 2026 May 24];9(4):272-278. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2022.045 
  3. University of Nebraska Medical Center. Renal dose modifications in antiinfective microbials [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 21]. Available from: https://www.unmc.edu/intmed/_documents/id/asp/dose-nm-anti-infective-renal-dosing-guidelines.pdf 
  4. Lathakumari RH, Vajravelu LK, Thulukanam J, Nair DM, Vimala PB, Panneerselvam V. Prevalence and molecular insights into carbapenem resistance: a 2-year retrospective analysis of superbugs in South India. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 30;12:1571231. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1571231 
  5. Codjoe FS, Donkor ES. Carbapenem resistance: a review. Med Sci (Basel). 2017 Dec 21;6(1):1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci6010001 
  6. Tripathi KD. Antimicrobial drugs. In: Tripathi M, editor. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. 8th ed. India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; p. 739-781. Available from: https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files3/f87428a2f2a044977b3c26eff96196f6.pdf 
  7. Park SH. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance in gram-negative bacteria in the community: a growing public health concern. Korean J Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):27-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2014.29.1.27 
  8. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. LiverTox®: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2012-. Cephalosporins, parenteral [updated 2024 May 9]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31643176/ 
  9. Drugs.com. Ciprofloxacin dosage guide [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 24]. Available from: https://www.drugs.com/dosage/ciprofloxacin.html 
  10. Dalhoff A. Global fluoroquinolone resistance epidemiology and implications for clinical use. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012;2012:976273. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/976273 
  11. Zhu C, Wei B, Li Y, Wang C. Antibiotic resistance rates in Cutibacterium acnes isolated from patients with acne vulgaris: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1565111. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1565111 
  12. Swallow MA, Fan R, Cohen JM, Bunick CG. Antibiotic resistance risk with oral tetracycline treatment of acne vulgaris. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jul 30;11(8):1032. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081032 
  13. Kubba R, Bajaj AK, Thappa DM, Sharma R, Vedamurthy M, Dhar S, et al. Oral antibiotics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75:35-36. Available from: https://ijdvl.com/oral-antibiotics/ 
  14. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for the treatment of leprosy [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 24]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/bda1236a-7bde-4ff9-b6f6-86a016db8275/content 
  15. Inamadar AC, Palit A. Acute skin failure: concept, causes, consequences and care. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2005;71:379-385. Available from: https://ijdvl.com/acute-skin-failure-concept-causes-consequences-and-care/ 
  16. Society of Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines 2021 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 23]. Available from: Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021 
  17. Kiran KC, Madhukara J, Abraham A, Muralidharan S. Cutaneous bacteriological profile in patients with pemphigus. Indian J Dermatol. 2018;63:301-304. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_152_17 
  18. Humphries RM, Kelesidis T, Dien Bard J, Ward KW, Bhattacharya D, Lewinski MA. Successful treatment of pan-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and bacteraemia with a combination of high-dose tigecycline and colistin. J Med Microbiol. 2010 Nov;59(Pt 11):1383-1386. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.023010-0 
  19. Alessandra O, Mascellino MT, Cipolla A, D’Abramo A, Rosa AD, Savinelli S. Therapeutic strategy for pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae severe infections: short-course treatment with colistin increases the in vivo and in vitro activity of double carbapenem regimen. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;33:132-134. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.01.011 
  20. Infectious Diseases Society of America. IDSA guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative infections: version 1.0 [Internet]. Available from: IDSA Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections: Version 1.0
 

Article Alerts

Subscribe to our articles alerts and stay tuned.


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Help ?